Limits on Non-Economic Damages
are Racially Discriminatory
Among the “tort reform” measures that the insurance industry, big business and organized medicine most desire is an arbitrary ceiling, or cap, on the amount an injured person could receive for non-economic injuries.
These are injuries that cause one to lose their quality of life – thousands of everyday things typically taken for granted like waking up without pain, eating food without someone’s help, dressing a child or even having children at all.
Thus, non-economic damages are particularly important to these vulnerable populations.3
From: “The Racial Implications of Tort Reform” by Joanne Doroshow and Amy Widman, 25 WASH. U. J.L. & POL'Y 161 (2007), is part of a volume entitled, “ACCESS TO JUSTICE: THE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF LAWYERS.” http://law.wustl.edu/Journal/index.asp?ID=6718. The full article is here: http://law.wustl.edu/Journal/25/DoroshowWidman.pdf
________________________________________________________
NOTES
1 See, e.g., Amanda Edwards, “Medical Malpractice Non-Economic Damages Caps: Recent Developments, 43 Harv.
J. on Legis. 219-221 (examining how such caps affect minority populations, and explaining how the data tables used to calculate economic damages project lower earnings for nonwhite workers, and this results in lower economic damages and more harm from non-economic damage caps.).
2 Congressman John Conyers, Press Release, “Conyers says: ‘Tort Reform Movement Has a Massively Disproportionate Impact on Minorities’” March 11, 2004.
3 Letter from Senator Ted Kennedy to President Bush, July 2002.