Our Opinion: Girl's Death May Dim View of Tort Reform
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
March 2, 2003
In family snapshots, Jesica Santillan looks cheerful, upbeat, even healthy,
underlining the tragedy of her death. The 17-year-old suffered from "restrictive
cardiomyopathy," which enlarges the heart and weakens the lungs.
Jesica's one fragile hope for recovery --- a heart-lung transplant ---
was doomed by an extraordinary mistake in the operating room at Duke University
Medical Center. Surgeons performed a second transplant, but it was too
late to save her. What must those days have been like for Jesica's family?
Yet, Jesica's tortured final days may have an unexpected legacy: The blood-type
mix-up that hastened her death seems to have slowed the tort reform juggernaut
in Congress. While that may not stanch her family's grief, it is a silver
lining of sorts.
What physicians are wrong about is the cause [of soaring medical malpractice
premiums]. The data about medical malpractice do not show that insurers
have been soaked. In fact, only one in eight malpractice victims ever
files a claim for compensation, according to a 1991 Harvard study. That,
despite the fact that an estimated 44,000 to 98,000 patients die every
year as a result of medical errors.
According to Americans for Insurance Reform, the average medical
malpractice insurance payout, over the last decade or so, was $28,524
--- a far cry from the multimillion-dollar payouts of insurance industry
mythology. (Many high jury awards are substantially cut on appeal.)
For a copy of the complete article, contact
AIR.
|