Storm Brews in GA Over Malpractice; Sharply Rising Insurance
Expenses Cause Some Doctors to Drop Services
Macon Telegraph
December 30, 2002
When Dr. Randy Lentz got his latest bill for malpractice insurance, he
knew something had to give.
A young family practitioner in Jesup, Lentz has only been in business
for about a year and a half. Thus far, he hasn't been sued.
Yet his bill for a year of insurance jumped nearly 300 percent, from $8,000
to $30,000.
So he decided to stop delivering babies, a sideline he offered to poor
women who can't afford the obstetrics specialists in town. His reasoning:
obstetrics work carries a higher risk of lawsuits and higher insurance
rates.
Lentz said he isn't taking any new patients, and expects to be out of
obstetrics altogether by next year.
"You just can't afford these rates," Lentz said.
. . .
In October, Americans for Insurance Reform published a study looking
at insurance industry income and expenditures.
Their conclusion: "Not only has there been no 'explosion' in medical
malpractice payouts at any time during the past 30 years, but payments
in constant dollars have been extremely stable and virtually flat since
the mid 1980s."
They found that "premiums rise and fall in concert with the state
of the economy reflecting gains and losses experienced by the insurance
industry's market investments."
Both the watchdog group and the trial lawyers say there's no evidence
that tort reform leads to lower malpractice insurance rates. Americans
for Insurance Reform says that tighter regulation is the key to lower
rates.
For a copy of the complete article, contact
AIR.
|