Fact Sheet: List of "Tort Reform" Laws for Hospitals and Doctors that are Already on the Books

Friday, April 8, 2005

The Medical Profession –
More Protection for Negligence
Than Any Profession in the Country

The following is a list of major tort restrictions enacted by states, each of which takes away the rights of patients injured by medical negligence, makes it more difficult for them to obtain fair compensation, and makes it harder to hold accountable those responsible.

No profession in the country currently has more legal protection for their negligence than the medical profession. Do they really need more?

And if the system is not working well for patients, here’s the reason why:

Alabama

87: med mal cap, noneconomic (but declared unconstitutional in 91)

87: med mal cap, total damages (but declared unconstitutional in 95)

87: punitive cap (but declared unconstitutional in 93)

87: collateral source (declared unconstitutional in part in 96, but then overruled in 2000)

99: punitive cap

Alaska

86: cap, noneconomic

86: joint and several liability

86: collateral source rule

88: joint and several liability (ballot initiative)

97: cap, noneconomic

97: punitive cap

97: prejudgment interest

Arizona

Pre-1985: med mal collateral source

87: joint and several

89: med mal structured settlements (but declared unconstitutional in 94)

Arkansas

Pre-1985: medical malpractice structured settlements

03: punitive cap

03: joint and several liability

California

Pre-1985: med mal cap, noneconomic; med mal collateral source; med mal contingency fees; med mal structured settlements

86: joint and several liability (ballot initiative)

Colorado

86: cap, noneconomic

86: joint and several liability

86: punitive cap

86: collateral source

88: med mal cap, non economic and all damages

88: med mal statute of repose

88: med mal structured settlements

92: med mal collateral source

03: med mal cap, noneconomic

Connecticut

Pre-1985: punitive cap, products

85: med mal collateral source

86: joint and several (i.e. proportional) liability

86: contingency fees

86: structured settlements

Delaware

Pre-1985: collateral source; med mal contingency fees; med mal structured settlements

District of Columbia

Pre-1985: collateral source

Florida

86: cap, noneconomic (but declared unconstitutional in 1987)

86: joint and several liability

86: collateral source

86: med mal structured settlements

86: contingency fees

86: punitive cap

88: med mal cap, noneconomic (depending on arbitration)

99: punitive cap

03: med mal cap, noneconomic

Georgia

87: punitive cap

87: joint and several liability

87: collateral source (but declared unconstitutional in 91)

03: prejudgment interest

Hawaii

86: cap, noneconomic

86: joint and several liability (except medical products)

86: collateral source (liens)

Idaho

87: cap, noneconomic

87: joint and several liability (except medical products)

87: structured settlements

90: collateral source

03: cap, noneconomic

03: punitive cap

03: joint and several liability, medical products

Illinois

Pre-1985: med mal punitive damages abolished; med mal collateral source

85: medical malpractice structured settlements

85: med mal contingency fees

95: cap, noneconomic (but declared unconstitutional in 97)

95: joint and several liability (but declared unconstitutional in 97)

95: punitive cap (but declared unconstitutional in 97)

Indiana

Pre-1985: joint and several liability

86: collateral source

93: med mal cap, all damages

93: med mal contingency fee

95: punitive cap

Iowa

Pre-1985: joint and several liability; med mal collateral source

86: structured settlements

87: collateral source

87: prejudgment interest

87: structured settlements

97: joint and several liability

97: prejudgment interest

Kansas

85: med mal punitive cap (but expired in 88)

86: med mal cap (but declared unconstitutional in 88)

86: med mal structured settlements (but declared unconstitutional in 88)

87: cap, noneconomic

87: punitive cap

88: cap, noneconomic

88: collateral source (but declared unconstitutional in 93)

Kentucky

88: joint and several liability (but codified common law rule)

88: collateral source (but declared unconstitutional in 95)

Louisiana

Pre-1985: med mal cap; med mal structured settlements (Patients Comp. fund); joint and several liability

87: joint and several liability

87: prejudgment interest

96: joint and several liability

03: med mal cap, noneconomic, for cases against nursing homes

Maine

85: med mal structured settlements

85: med mal contingency fees

88: prejudgment interest

89: med mal collateral source

Maryland

Pre-1985: collateral source

86: cap, noneconomic

86: structured settlements

Massachusetts

86: med mal cap, noneconomic

86: med mal collateral source

86: med mal contingency fees

Michigan

86: med mal cap, noneconomic

86: collateral source

86: structured settlements

86: prejudgment interest

87: joint and several liability

93: med mal cap, noneconomic

95: joint and several liability

Minnesota

86: cap, noneconomic (but repealed in 90)

86: collateral source

86: prejudgment interest

88: joint and several liability

Mississippi

89: joint and several liability

98: med mal statute of repose

02: med mal cap, noneconomic

02: joint and several liability, med mal

04: med mal cap, noneconomic

04: cap, noneconomic

04: punitive cap

04: joint and several liability

Missouri

86: med mal cap, noneconomic

86: med mal structured settlements

87: joint and several liability

87: collateral source

Montana:

87: joint and several liability (but declared unconstitutional in 94)

87: collateral source

95: med mal cap, noneconomic

95: med mal structured settlements

97: joint and several liability

03: punitive cap

Nebraska

Pre-1985: collateral source

Pre-1985: med mal cap, all damages (cap increased in 92, 03)

86: prejudgment interest (but improved prior standard)

92: joint and several liability (but improved prior standard)

Nevada

Pre-1985: med mal collateral source

87: joint and several liability

89: punitive cap

02: med mal cap, noneconomic

02: joint and several liability

04: med mal cap, noneconomic (initiative)

04: joint and several liability (initiative)

04: structured settlements (initiative)

New Hampshire

86: cap, noneconomic (but declared unconstitutional in 91)

86: punitive damages abolished

89: joint and several liability

95: prejudgment interest

01: prejudgment interest

New Jersey

Pre-1985: contingency fees

87: joint and several liability

87: collateral source

95: punitive cap

95: joint and several liability

New Mexico

87: joint and several liability (but codified common law)

92: med mal structured settlement

92: med mal cap (except punitive damages)

New York

86: joint and several liability

86: collateral source

86: structured settlements

86: med mal contingency fees

03: structured settlements

North Carolina

95: punitive cap

North Dakota

87: joint and several liability

87: collateral source

87: structured settlements

93: punitive cap

95: med mal cap, noneconomic

Ohio

87: joint and several liability

87: structured settlements

96: cap, noneconomic (but declared unconstitutional in 99)

96: joint and several liability (but declared unconstitutional in 99)

96: punitive cap (but declared unconstitutional in 99)

96: collateral source (but declared unconstitutional in 99)

96: prejudgment interest

03: med mal cap, noneconomic

03: joint and several liability

03: collateral source, med mal

04: cap, noneconomic

04: punitive cap

04: collateral source

04: prejudgment interest

Oklahoma:

86: prejudgment interest

95: punitive cap

03: med mal cap, noneconomic

03: collateral source

03: prejudgment interest, med mal

04: med mal cap, noneconomic

04: joint and several liability

04: prejudgment interest

Oregon

87: cap, noneconomic (but declared unconstitutional in 99)

87: joint and several liability

87: med mal punitive damages abolished against doctors

87: collateral source

95: joint and several liability

Pennsylvania

Pre-1985: med mal collateral source

96: med mal punitive cap

02: joint and several liability

02: collateral source

02: structured settlements

Rhode Island

86: med mal collateral source

87: prejudgment interest

South Carolina

Pre-1985: med mal structured settlements (Patient Comp. Fund with annual cap)

South Dakota

Pre-1985: med mal collateral source

Pre-1985: med mal cap, noneconomic

86: med mal cap, economic (but declared unconstitutional 96)

86: med mal structured settlements

87: joint and several liability

Tennessee

Pre-1985: med mal collateral source

Texas

87: med mal cap (but declared unconstitutional in 88, although allowed for wrongful death in 90)

87: joint and several liability

87: punitive cap

87: prejudgment interest

95: joint and several liability

95: punitive cap

03: med mal cap, noneconomic

03: joint and several liability

03: prejudgment interest

Utah

85: med mal collateral source

86: med mal cap, noneconomic

86: joint and several liability

86: med mal structured settlements

99: joint and several liability

Vermont:

Pre-85: joint and several liability

Virginia

Pre-1985: med mal cap (although cap raised in 83 and 99)

87: med mal (children injured at birth, no right to sue, no noneconomic or punitive damages)

87: punitive cap

Washington

Pre-1985: punitive cap; med mal collateral source

86: cap, noneconomic damages (but declared unconstitutional in 89)

86: joint and several liability

86: structured settlements

04: prejudgment interest

West Virginia

86: med mal cap, noneconomic

86: med mal joint and several liability

03: med mal cap, noneconomic

03: joint and several liability

Wisconsin

Pre-1985: med mal (Patient Compensation Fund)

86: med mal cap, noneconomic (but expired 90)

86: med mal contingency fees

95: med mal cap, noneconomic

95: joint and several liability

95: med mal structured settlements

95: med mal collateral source

Wyoming

86: joint and several liability

 

Download the PDF >

Updated: April 8, 2005

Join Our Fight!

The Center for Justice & Democracy is the only national consumer organization in the country exclusively dedicated to protecting our civil justice system. If you'd like more information, please contact us.

Connect with us

CIVIL JUSTICE ISSUES IN YOUR STATE