FACTS ABOUT TORT LITIGATION IN THE UNITED STATES
TORT CASES REPRESENT A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF CIVIL CASELOADS.
TORT CASELOADS ARE FALLING WHILE CONTRACT CASELOADS INCREASE.
FEW TORT CASES ARE RESOLVED THROUGH TRIAL AND THE NUMBER IS DECLINING.
INJURED VICTIMS OFTEN LOSE AT TRIAL; IF THEY PREVAIL, AWARDS ARE MODEST.
PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE RARELY AWARDED AND MODEST IN AMOUNT.
Updated November 2011
NOTES
[1] Richard LaFountain et al., Examining the Work of State Courts: An Analysis of 2008 State Court Caseloads (National Center for State Courts 2010) at 26, found at http://www.ncsconline.org/d_research/csp/2008_files/Civil.pdf.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Id. at 27.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Id. at 30.
[7] Ibid.
[8] U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Punitive Damage Awards in State Courts, 2005” (NCJ 233094)(March 2011) at 2 (Table 2), found at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/pdasc05.pdf.
[9] U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Appeals of Civil Trials Concluded in 2005,” NCJ 235187 (October 2011) at 2, found at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/actc05.pdf.
[10] U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Tort Bench and Jury Trials in State Courts, 2005,” NCJ 228129 (November 2009) at 12 (Table 12), found at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/tbjtsc05.pdf.
[11] Ibid.
[12] Id. at 1, 4 (Table 4).
[13] Id. at 12 (Table 12), 13.
[14] Id. at 5 (Table 5).
[15] Id. at 12 (Table 12), 13.
[16] Id. at 8 (Table 7).
[17] Id. at 8.
[18] “Punitive Damage Awards in State Courts, 2005,” supra n. 8, at 4 (Table 5).
[19] Ibid.
[20] Id. at 5 (Table 8).
[21] Ibid.