Center for Justice and Democracy
90 Broad Street, Suite 401
New York, New York 10004
www.centerjd.org | centerjd@centerjd.org
212.267.2801

MYTHBUSTER

ASBESTOS CASES ARE NOT OVERWHELMING OUR COURTS;

COURTS ARE ADEQUATELY HANDLING THEM

 

 

January 2007

 

NOTES

1“Asbestos Cases In the Courts: No Logjam,” Public Citizen, Congress Watch (February 2006) at 12 (citing “Tort Trials and Verdicts in Large Counties, 2001”, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (November 2004). This study covers states courts in the nation’s 75 largest counties.

2 Ibid at 12 (citing “Tort Trials and Verdicts in Large Counties, 2001” (November 2004) and “Tort Trials and Verdicts in Large Counties, 1996”), U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

3 Ibid at 6 (citing “Judicial Business of the United States Courts,” Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

4 Ibid at 9 (citing Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts).

5 Ibid at 10 (citing Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts). This excludes a spike in filings in 2002 that, according to Public Citizen, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (“Judicial Business of the United States Courts 2002”) attributes to a jurisdictional issue wherein thousands of cases claiming asbestos exposure from brake pads were removed from state to federal court.

6 Ibid at 10 (citing “Federal Tort Trials and Verdicts, 2002-03,” U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics).

7 Ibid (citing U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics: “Federal Tort Trials and Verdicts, 2002-2003”; “Federal Tort Trials and Verdicts, 1996-1997”; “Federal Tort Trials and Verdicts, 1994-1995.”)